Note that VirtualBox will need to hook in to your host computer’s device drivers for Keyboard, mouse, hard disk, video display, USB and other devices.
Then double-click on the VirtualBox.mpkg package installer file to launch the installer.Īdditional Mac OS X installation notes can be found here. Follow the typical prompts to install VirtualBox.Īdditional Windows installation notes can be found hereįor Apple Mac OS X, double-click on the VirtualBox-5.1.12-112440-OSX.dmg file to mount it. Install VirtualBox according to your regular operating system method for installing new programs.įor Microsoft Windows host OS, double-click on the VirtualBox-5.1.12-112440-Win.exe installation program downloaded from the VirtualBox web site. This will be installed after the main VirtualBox program is installed. If you are running Windows, select “Windows Hosts” and so on.ĭownload the VirtualBox Extension Pack as well. For example, if you are running MacOS X, select “OS X Hosts”. This section of the tutorial describes how to download and obtain the VirtualBox software for your host operating system.ĭownload the appropriate VirtualBox program for your host operating system. Even if a promissory estoppel theory would work, the person speaking to you would still have to be in some position (or appear to be in some position) to bind Oracle to a promise he/she made.Obtaining and Installing VirtualBox software In all honesty, the legal issue is more likely to be whether the person on the phone had apparent authority to grant a license. I have a hard time imagining a case being granted summary judgment for the defendant just because Oracle's customer sales rep told him "we don't really care." (detrimental reliance in triple square brackets)
A's promise is binding and B is entitled to payment on completion of the course without regard to whether his performance was “bargained for” under § 71. B goes to college, and borrows and ]] When he has nearly completed his course, A notifies him of an intention to revoke the promise. However, hiring someone based on that understanding might be.Ī, knowing that B is going to college, promises B that A will give him $ 5,000 on completion of his course. Being able to use a product isn't in an of itself to your detriment.
However, at common law - and as shown in the examples if you'd keep reading - there has to be some detrimental reliance. I can understand how you'd think that, reading the text of the rule in the Restatement.
0 kommentar(er)
